Manuscript submission:
Vita Scientia employs an online submission and management system for peer review and manuscript tracking. Manuscripts must be
submitted online by the corresponding author at www.vitascientia.net Authors may need to register as new users upon their first
visit. The website provides straightforward sign-in and registration procedures.
The editorial management system enables authors to track the progress of their manuscript review in real time. Detailed,
step-by-step instructions for submitting manuscripts can be found on the website. All correspondence regarding the manuscript must
be conducted through the online editorial management system.
Please note that manuscripts can only be submitted through the journal’s online manuscript submission and evaluation system at
www.vitascientia.net submissions made via any other medium will not be evaluated.
Upon submission, manuscripts will undergo a technical evaluation process. The editorial office staff will verify that the manuscript has been
prepared and submitted in accordance with the journal’s guidelines. Submissions that fail to meet these guidelines will be returned
for technical corrections.
Manuscript preparation:
Authors must use the manuscript template provided on our website and article submission system (www.vitascientia.net). Utilizing this
template will facilitate manuscript preparation and help prevent delays due to technical check issues.
Manuscripts should include the following elements in this order:
- Title
- Author names and affiliations
- Abstract
- Keywords
- Results and Discussion
- Conclusion
- Materials and Methods
- Acknowledgements
- Authorship statement
- Conflict of interest statement
Tables and figures should be embedded within the text where they are referenced,
rather than in a separate section at the end of the manuscript.
Manuscript elements detailed guidelines:
- Title :
The title should be concise and informative, as it plays a crucial role in information retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations
and formulas whenever possible. The title must be written in sentence case, using lower case except for the first word and
proper nouns. Symbols, formulas, or arbitrary abbreviations should not be included in the title, with the exception of
chemical symbols indicating the structure of isotopically labeled compounds.
- Author names and affiliations:
Author names must be presented in full, with surnames (family names) in capital letters. If there is potential for ambiguity
(e.g., double names or confusion between first and last names), clarify this explicitly. Affiliation addresses should be
provided below the author’s names, indicated by lowercase superscript numbers corresponding to each author's name. Present
the affiliations in the following order: Department, Faculty, University, City, Country. The full postal address, including
the country name, is required for each affiliation.
- Present/Permanent Address :
If an author has relocated since the research was conducted, a "Present Address" or "Permanent Address" may be indicated as a
footnote next to their name. The main affiliation address must reflect where the research was conducted, using superscript
Arabic numerals for footnotes.
- Corresponding Author :
One author must be designated as the corresponding author. This individual will handle all correspondence with the Vita Scientia
editorial office and must be the person listed as such in the manuscript if accepted. The manuscript must be submitted online
by the corresponding author, who will oversee all stages of the editorial process. Please provide phone and fax numbers (with
country and area codes), an institutional email address, and the complete postal address. The corresponding author must ensure
that all authors’ contact details remain updated.
- Abstract :
Authors are required to submit a graphical abstract of their research findings. The visual abstract should represent the main
findings or key concepts of their research in a visually engaging format, aiding readers in quickly grasping the study's essence.
The graphical abstract should be clear, concise, and easily interpretable, with minimal text, focusing on key elements of the study.
We encourage the use of color and simple icons. A concise, factual, unstructured summary is required, limited to 250 words for
research and review articles and 200 words for commentaries. The summary should briefly state the purpose of the research,
the experimental approach, key results, and major conclusions. Since the summary may be presented separately from the article,
it should be comprehensible on its own, avoiding references. Non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be defined at first mention.
- Keywords :
Each submission must include four to six keywords that reflect the scientific content for subject indexing at the end of the summary.
Keywords should be listed in full, without abbreviations, and only well-established abbreviations in the field should be used
- Introduction :
The introduction should outline the objectives of the study, define the scope of the paper, summarize relevant previous work,
and provide adequate background information. It should not be a literature review but should conclude with a clear statement
of the question being addressed, informing the reader of the rationale and significance of the study.
- Results :
Results must be presented clearly and concisely. Text, tables, and figures should show minimal overlap and must be internally consistent.
Tables and figures should enhance the presentation and comprehension of the data. Each dataset should be presented only once, either
as a figure or a table.
- Discussion :
The results and discussion sections should be combined. Avoid extensive citations and discussions of published literature; instead,
focus on interpreting the significance of the results and relating them to existing knowledge clearly and briefly. Information
repeated elsewhere in the manuscript should not be revisited in the discussion.
- Conclusions :
Present the main conclusions in a separate section, which should stand alone. Clearly explain whether the findings support the
original hypothesis, avoiding references in this section.
- Materials and methods :
For previously published methods, provide a citation, detailing only relevant modifications. Describe experimental procedures
in sufficient detail to enable replication. Include names and locations of manufacturers for all equipment and chemicals mentioned,
using brand names only once in the manuscript, referring to them as "formulation A," "product B," etc., thereafter. Detail the
purity of key compounds and methods for determining purity.
Identification of hazardous chemicals and handling precautions should appear at the beginning of this section. Manuscripts
involving animal or human studies must specify the approving committee and institution.
- Characterization of Synthesized Compounds :
Provide sufficient experimental information, including melting point ranges for crystalline products, the solvent used for
recrystallization, and descriptions of the materials. Evidence confirming the identity and purity of new compounds should
include elemental analysis and relevant NMR data. Authors are encouraged to submit a list of compounds as a separate
file for review, detailing chemical structures and characterization techniques.
- Acknowledgements :
Acknowledgements should be collated in a separate section at the end of the article, prior to the references.
This section may recognize financial support, contributions from colleagues, or other assistance. Ensure permission
has been obtained from individuals acknowledged.
- Authorship statement :
Author contributions should be outlined before the conflict of interest statement, using initials instead of full names.
Format it as follows:
Author contributions: Concept – I.K., E.T.; Design – I.K., E.T.; Supervision – E.T.; Resource – I.K.; Materials –
N.K., A.D.; Data Collection &/or Processing - N.K., A.D.; Analysis &/or Interpretation - N.K., A.D.;
Literature Search – I.K., E.T., N.K., A.D.; Writing – E.T., I.K.; Critical Reviews – I.K., E.T., N.K., A.D.
- Conflict of interest statement :
Authors and reviewers must disclose any existing or potential conflicts of interest, including financial, consultant, and
institutional affiliations that may influence the work. Any financial support for the study should be disclosed.
If no conflicts exist, state: “The authors declared no conflict of interest.
- References :
Citation in Text
Cite the most recent publications, following the Vancouver style. References should be numbered consecutively in the
order they appear in the text, using square brackets (e.g., [1], [2-5]). Authors are responsible for the accuracy of
references, and all cited works must appear in the reference list and vice versa. Personal communications or unpublished
materials should not be included. For non-English publications, provide the English title if available.
Web References
Web references are generally not recommended, except for exceptional cases like government or international
organization websites.
Examples:
- Reference to a journal publication:
[1] Author A, Author B. Title of the paper. Journal Name. Year; Volume (Issue): Page Range. DOI.
- Reference to a book:
Author C. Title of the Book. Edition. Publisher; Year.
- Reference to a chapter in an edited book:
Author D. Title of the chapter. In: Editor(s). Title of the book. Publisher; Year. Page range.
- Tables :
Submit tables as editable text, placing them next to relevant text. Number tables consecutively and include footnotes below
the table body. Use sentence case for table headings and avoid vertical rules.
- Figures :
Figures must be submitted both within the manuscript and as separate files. All figures should have a caption and be numbered .
(e.g., Figure 1). Captions should be concise and explanatory. Submit figures in TIFF or JPEG format at 300 dpi or higher.
Ensure permission is obtained for any reproduced images.
- Image Manipulation Guidelines :
Clarity and Ethics: Image manipulation to improve clarity and readability is permitted. However, any alterations intended to
misrepresent data or results will be deemed unethical and may lead to manuscript rejection or retraction.
Nonlinear Adjustments: All nonlinear adjustments, such as changes to contrast, brightness, or color balance, must be applied
consistently across the entire image. These adjustments should not obscure, eliminate, or misrepresent original data.
Disclosure Requirements: Authors must explicitly disclose all image manipulations in the figure legends, including details
of the adjustments made.
Prohibited Manipulations: Addition, removal, or relocation of specific image elements. Selective enhancement of
specific regions without proper disclosure.
Original Data: Authors should retain the original, unaltered image data and be prepared to provide it upon request by the
editorial team.
Verification: The editorial team reserves the right to request original image files for verification purposes during the
review process. Failure to comply may result in rejection.
- Nomenclature :
Authors are responsible for ensuring correct nomenclature throughout their manuscripts. Only generic and chemical names of drugs should be
used; proprietary names may be mentioned once in the Materials and Methods section. The formally adopted nonproprietary names listed in
the International Nonproprietary Names (INN) by the World Health Organization should be utilized. The nomenclature of chemical substances
must be consistent, clear, and unambiguous, adhering to the conventions set by the American Chemical Society and the International Union
of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). When in doubt, authors should consult the indexes of Chemical Abstracts and resources from the
American Chemical Society Committee on Nomenclature, Spelling, and Pronunciation, as well as the International Union of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology (IUBMB) publication Biochemical Nomenclature and Related Documents (Portland Press, London).
- Symbols, Units, and Abbreviations :
Symbols such as ×, α, β, γ, δ, λ, µ, η, or ν should be inserted using the Symbol manu in Word. The degree symbol (°) must be inserted
from the Symbol manu, not as a superscript. Multiplication symbols must be represented as (×), not with the letter x. Spaces should be
placed between numbers and units (e.g., 10 mg) as well as between numbers and mathematical symbols (+, –, ×, =, <, >), but not between
numbers and percent symbols (e.g., 95%). SI units should be used.
- Non-standard or uncommon abbreviations and acronyms should be minimized and defined upon first use. Latin terms such as et al.,
in vitro, or in situ should not be italicized. However, Latin binomial names of plants, animals, and microorganisms should be
italicized, with genus names capitalized (e.g., Atropa belladonna, Mus musculus, Staphylococcus aureus).
- Common abbreviations include: - mp, bp, TLC, GC, HPLC, UPLC, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-MS/MS, HRMS, FAB HRMS, UV, IR, FTIR,
DNase, ED50, ID50, IC50, LD50, mRNA, RNase, rRNA, tRNA, cpm, Ci, Vmax, Km, k, t1/2, AMP, ADP, ATP (and their nucleoside analogs),
Cyp, FAD, NAD+, NADH, NADP+, NADPH, GSH, GSSG.
- Units should be abbreviated without punctuation, with no distinction between singular and plural forms (e.g., 1 ml, 50 ml).
- Units of Measurement:
Mass: kg (kilogram), g (gram), mg (milligram), μg (microgram), ng (nanogram), mol (mole), mmol (millimole), μmol (micromole),
nmol (nanomole), pmol (picomole), fmol (femtomole), eq (equivalent).
Time: h (hour), min (minute), s (second), ms (millisecond), μs (microsecond).
Volume: l (litre), ml (millilitre), μl (microlitre).
Length: m (metre), cm (centimetre), mm (millimetre), μm (micrometre), nm (nanometre).
Concentration: M (molar), mM (millimolar), μM (micromolar), nM (nanomolar), pM (picomolar), ppm (parts per million).
Heat, Energy, Electricity: J (Joule), °C (degree Celsius), C (Coulomb), A (Ampere), V (Volt), Ω (ohm), S (Siemens).
Radiation: Ci (curie), cpm (counts per minute), dpm (disintegrations per minute), Bq (becquerel).
Miscellaneous: g (gravity), Kd (dissociation constant), LD50 (median lethal dose), ED50 (median effective dose), P (probability),
i.v. (intravenous), i.p. (intraperitoneal), s.c. (subcutaneous), i.m. (intramuscular), cm² (square centimetre), S.D. (standard deviation),
S.E.M. (standard error of the mean).
- Formula and Equations:
Structural chemical formulas, process flow diagrams, and complex mathematical expressions must be presented clearly. All subscripts,
superscripts, Greek letters, and unusual characters should be explicitly identified. All chemical structures and reaction schemes
must be created by the authors. Quoting these materials from other sources (journals, books, websites, etc.) is not permitted. Chemical
formulas and reaction schemes should be drawn using molecule editing software such as ChemSketch or ChemDraw, with the drawing style
set to ACS. Authors may choose whether to depict terminal carbons. Structures must be saved as TIFF or JPEG images and embedded into
the main Word document (at the end) using the insert image function. All chemical structures and reaction schemes should be labeled
as Figures (Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.).
For mathematical formulas, use the equation add-on feature of MS Word (Insert > Symbols > Equation). Do not insert mathematical equations
as images. Simple formulas should be presented inline when possible, using the solidus (/) for small fractional terms (e.g., X/Y).
Variables should be italicized. Powers of e may be denoted as *exp*. Number equations consecutively if they are displayed separately
from the text.
Examples:
- Presentation of equations in the text:
\[(\text{Eq. 1}) \quad \log(1/C) = -k_1 (\log P)^2 + k_2 \log P + k_3\]
Presentation of equations produced by MS Word:
\[(\text{Eq. 2})\]
- Supplementary Material:
Supplementary material, including images, tables, detailed experimental procedures, and chromatographic and spectral findings,
can be published alongside your article to enhance its content. In the case of molecular studies, the author should provide a list
of primers, cell lines, genotypes etc. All supplementary items should be submitted in a single PDF document. We will publish the
materials exactly as we receive them. Accompany your supplementary material with a concise, descriptive caption. If changes are
needed during the process, submit an updated file instead of annotating the previous version. Ensure that 'Track Changes' is turned
off in Microsoft Office files, as any visible changes will appear in the published version. Tables and figures in supplementary
materials should be labeled (e.g., Table S1, Figure S1) to avoid confusion with those in the main manuscript.
- Revisions:
When submitting a revised version of a paper, authors must include a detailed “Response to the Reviewers” document that addresses
each issue raised by the reviewers point by point. This should include each reviewer’s comment followed by the author’s response
and the corresponding line numbers where changes have been made. Annotated copies of the main document must also be provided.
Revised manuscripts should be submitted within 60 days of the decision letter. Failure to submit within this timeframe may result
in cancellation of the revision option. If additional time is required, authors should request an extension before the initial
60-day period expires.
Accepted manuscripts will undergo copy-editing for grammar, punctuation, and format. Once the publication process is complete,
the manuscript will be published online as “articles in press” before being included in a scheduled issue. A PDF proof of
the accepted manuscript will be sent to the corresponding author, who must approve publication within 2 days of receiving
the proof. No new data or changes to author names will be permitted at this stage.
- Changes to Authorship:
Authors must carefully consider the list and order of authors prior to submission and provide a definitive list at the time of
the original submission. Any addition, deletion, or rearrangement of authors after submission—even if the paper is accepted—is
strongly discouraged and may result in rejection if the editor finds the request unreliable or unnecessary. Changes will only be
considered under exceptional circumstances, and publication will be suspended during the editor's review of the request.
The corresponding author must provide the following to the editor:
1. The reason for the change in authorship.
2. Written confirmation from all authors agreeing to the addition, removal, or rearrangement, including confirmation
from any author being added or removed.
- After Acceptance (Video Preparation Guidelines for Authors):
As part of our commitment to enhancing the visibility of your research, Vita Scientia invites authors to create a short
video (3-5 minutes) summarizing their article. These videos will be published on the journal's YouTube channel, Social media
ensuring lifelong accessibility for your work.
Video Content:
- 1. Introduction (30 seconds):
- ● Introduce yourself (name, affiliation).
- ● Briefly state the title of your article.
- 2. Research Objectives (1 minute):
- ● Explain the main goals and motivations behind your study.
- ● Highlight any important questions your research addresses.
- 3. Methodology (1 minute):
- ● Provide a concise overview of the methods you used.
- ● Mention any key techniques or approaches that set your research apart.
- 4. Key Findings (1 minute):
- ● Summarize the main results of your study.
- ● Discuss their significance and implications for the field.
- 5. Conclusion (30 seconds):
- ● Conclude with a statement about the future direction of your research or its potential impact.
Technical Requirements:
- ● Format: MP4 or MOV
- ● Resolution: Minimum 1080p for clear viewing
- ● Audio: Ensure clear audio quality; use a good microphone if possible
- ● Background: Choose a clean and quiet setting for recording. Avoid distractions in the background
Submission Guidelines:
- ● Send your video to the editorial team via email at editor@vitascientia.net
- ● Include your name and article title in the subject line
- ● Please submit your video within 15 days of receiving your acceptance letter
- Online Proof Correction:
Corresponding authors will receive an email with a link to their proofs. Authors should annotate and upload their edits on the PDF
version, following all instructions provided in the email. Proofs should be used solely for checking the typesetting, editing,
completeness, and correctness of the text, tables, and figures. Significant changes to the article as accepted will only be
considered at this stage with the editor's permission. It is crucial to ensure that all corrections are submitted in one communication,
as subsequent corrections cannot be guaranteed for inclusion. Proofreading is the sole responsibility of the authors.
Types of articles:
Manuscripts submitted to Vita Scientia are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief, a
dedicated editor, members of the journal’s Editorial, Advisory Board, and independent experts as necessary. The Editor-in-Chief
reserves the right to reject a manuscript without conducting a full review if it is deemed "out of scope" or fails to meet the
minimum standards for publication in Vita Scientia.
- Research Articles
Research Articles in Vita Scientia present significant and original experimental or theoretical research in biology, agriculture, and
medicine. These articles should present innovative, hypothesis-driven research supported by robust experimental design, methodology,
and thorough data interpretation. Authors are encouraged to present their findings in a clear and concise manner, with manuscripts
ideally not exceeding 6000 words of text and a total of 7 figures and/or tables. Any additional data, including extra text, figures,
or tables, should be submitted as supplementary material.
- Review Articles (by invitation only)
Review Articles in Vita Scientia offer a comprehensive overview of broad topics of general interest to professionals in biology,
agriculture, and medicine. The word limit of these articles is 5000 words (excluding reference) and maximum 4 tables/figures.
Reviews should be written in a manner that is accessible to a wide audience, including students, early-career researchers,
and experienced professors. Authors should aim to balance depth and clarity to cater to readers with varying levels of expertise
in the subject. Review articles must include the latest developments and findings in the chosen topic. Authors are encouraged to
incorporate recent studies and advances to provide readers with a current understanding of the field. Beyond summarizing existing
literature, reviews should reflect the authors’ critical interpretation. Articles should provide insightful discussions that go
beyond reporting, offering fresh perspectives and conceptual understanding. Reviews should identify and highlight questions that
remain unanswered or areas that require further exploration. This helps to set the stage for future research and provides readers
with a roadmap of the field’s key challenges. Authors are encouraged to present hypotheses or theories that could address unsolved
mysteries in the field. These speculative yet scientifically grounded insights can stimulate new research directions and contribute
to the growth of the discipline. Authors interested in submitting a Review to Vita Scientia should first provide the title, abstract,
and a brief outline to Dr. Shiv Mani Dubey, Editor-in-Chief, for approval.
- Commentaries/Opinions
Commentaries in Vita Scientia address current scientific and public issues, offering insights and perspectives from distinguished
researchers in biology, agriculture, and medicine on the field’s current state and future directions. Commentaries are generally
published by invitation only. Authors interested in submitting a Commentary to Vita Scientia should submit a brief outline to
the Editor-in-Chief, requesting an invitation to contribute to this category. Contributions should center on a specific issue,
debate, or innovation, offering a clear and concise perspective. The aim is to spark constructive dialogue and critical thinking
among the journal’s readership. Opinions should be supported by relevant literature or data wherever possible. While the section
allows for speculative ideas, they should be grounded in logical reasoning and scientific principles. Articles in this section
should be concise, ideally between 1,000–2,000 words. Authors should focus on delivering their message effectively without
unnecessary elaboration.
- Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor in Vita Scientia provide a platform for discussing important aspects, overlooked details, or gaps in
previously published articles. Submissions may also cover relevant topics within the journal’s scope that may capture readers’
interest, including educational case reports. Readers are welcome to submit comments on published articles as Letters to the Editor.
These submissions should be concise, unstructured, and should not include an abstract, keywords, tables, figures, images, or
other media. The referenced article must be properly cited within the letter.
We believe this initiative will enhance the reach of your work and engage a
broader audience in your research. Thank you for your contribution to Vita Scientia.